What now for Africa's big game hunting industry?

By mahlokoane percy ngwato

Stay Connected! Follow @AfricaBizReview and @MrNLon on Twitter. Like our Facebook Page.

Before he was killed by American Dentist Walter James Palmer, Cecil the lion was a popular attraction for international tourists visiting Zimbabwe’s Hwange National Park.

Since then, stories have promulgated that the beloved lion (who was part of an Oxford University study dating back to 1999) was lured from the nature reserve before being slain, as well as the animal suffering for up to 40 hours before he was finally shot dead with a rifle.

While the world vents its collective scorn over social media (alongside the deliberations of the Zimbabwean legal system) it is now more pertinent than ever to question the economic legitimacy of the global

A recent article by National Geographic highlighted that regulated hunting is not only secured by a series of international treaties but is also supported by the likes of the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) as integral to global conservation efforts.

RELATED:
The Top 10 most tourism-ready African economies of 2015
South African VISA changes potentially harmful to tourism industry
Opportunity knocks for a new-age tourism sector

A piece in the Endangered Species Handbook rightly compares revenues raised from hunting with those raised by eco-tourism and concludes that the latter makes more economic (not to mention environmental) sense.

This has recently been backed up by an interesting study on the economic worth of elephants conducted by iworry, a campaign set up to prioritise cracking down on the illegal ivory trade. ‘Dead or Alive? Valuing an Elephant’ highlights that an elephant brings roughly $23,000 a year to local economies, which totals over $1.5 million over the course of its lifetime.

The Centre for Responsible Travel (CREST) notes that eco-tourism captures $77 billion of the global market and is predicted to make more gains in the future. Recent research by the International Federation for Animal Welfare (IFAW) suggests that legal hunting contributes just $200 million to African economies and contributes as little as 2 percent to tourism revenues.

Palmer insists that his hunt was conducted within the boundaries of the law and indeed much hunting is carried out legally. There is certainly a case to be made for controlling populations in the interests of biodiversity, but can the killing of any endangered animal (even legally) truly be justified? 

Sources: [endangeredspecieshandbook, National Geographic, CREST, IFAW, Scientific American, iworry

Share

Featured Articles

Musk’s multibillion hostile Twitter takeover – the timeline

As billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk buys Twitter for US$44bn, we draw up a timeline, from the buying of shares to the critical tweets and unsolicited bid

Sustainable moves businesses can make to win customers, IBM

With half of consumers saying environmental sustainability is more important today than a year ago, businesses should up their eco action, says IBM report

Banks and consultancies top workplaces to grow career in UK

Financial and professional services firms rank highest in LinkedIn Top 25 best workplaces list – from Barclays, Lloyds and HSBC, to PwC, Deloitte and EY

Top 10 women in technology in Europe

Leadership & Strategy

The value of ESG links sustainability to business returns

Sustainability

Top 10 European football clubs by revenue 2022 – Deloitte

Corporate Finance