How are Apple and Amazon able to Evade Corporation Tax in Europe?

By Annifer Jackson

The European Union is making clear its intention to clamp down on blue chip companies not paying their fair share of corporation taxes.

In recent weeks it has opened up investigations into two of the world’s largest and most well-known brands, technology giant Apple and e-commerce dominator Amazon.  

The former faces an €8 billion fine relating to its dealings in Ireland, while Amazon is being probed into its arrangements with Luxembourg, the country that handles the lion's share of its European profits.

Both companies are thought to be breaking state aid regulations, but in different ways.

While Apple’s corporate structure allows it to keep tax-deductible costs in high-tax countries while passing profits through low-tax Ireland, Amazon’s arrangements allow its Luxembourg unit to pay a royalty to its parent and thus channel profit out of Europe.

READ MORE: Amazon being Investigated by EU over Luxembourg Tax Dealings

Both processes produce the same result – a lower corporation tax bill.

The Apple case is particularly intriguing. It has been made clear for some time that the company has an abnormal tax situation in Ireland, brought to light by investigations in America, unhappy that profits had been channelled away into the newly-fashionable European technology hub of Dublin.

Ireland is able to take profits made from sales in other countries thanks to its various business channels.

For example, an iPad bought in America could involve payment to a manufacturing subsidiary while also paying fees to another subsidiary in Ireland as part of an intellectual property cost-sharing agreement.

The Irish government denies any favourable tax arrangements for Apple and says that the company is being taxed appropriately.

Some commentators tracing back as far as 1990 believe their deals are based on what profit is relevant to activity in Ireland, which leads one to ask why companies are allowed to channel profits into countries irrelevant to its origin. 

The European Commission remains defiant, and will continue to push such companies as far as they can.

Commission Vice President in charge of competition policy Joaquín Almunia said: "National authorities must not allow selected companies to understate their taxable profits by using favourable calculation methods. It is only fair that subsidiaries of multinational companies pay their share of taxes and do not receive preferential treatment which could amount to hidden subsidies.”

Share

Featured Articles

Top 10 largest revenue generating family businesses in MENAT

From the UAE to Turkey, these family firms are the largest by revenue in MENAT and cover everything from energy to entertainment

Top 10 metaverse projects in the UAE, including world firsts

As Accenture predicts the metaverse will fuel a US$1 trilion commerce opportunity by 2025, we round up 10 pioneering metaverse projects in the UAE

PwC’s survey shows Middle East CEOs remain upbeat on growth

CEOs in the Middle East are far more optimistic about regional growth than those in North America and Europe, according to PwC’s annual survey

Opinion: “Why we must tackle the digital skills crisis"

Leadership & Strategy

5 Mins With: Kathryn Kaminsky Vice Chair Trust Solutions PwC

Leadership & Strategy

Survey: The Future of Cloud Security in the Middle East

Technology